A Simple Example of a Text Modal


The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. 

 

 

Close this Modal

Commission Decision No. 021-M-02/2018 In the Matter of Udenna Corporation, Chelsea Logistics Holdings Corporation, and Trans-Asia Shipping Lines Inc.’s Alleged Violation of the Compulsory Notification Requirements under Section 17 of the Philippine Competition Act and Rule 4, Section 3 of the Rules and Regulations to Implement Republic Act No. 10667

/ Commission Decision No. 021-M-02/2018 In the Matter of Udenna Corporation, Chelsea Logistics Holdings Corporation, and Trans-Asia Shipping Lines Inc.’s Alleged Violation of the Compulsory Notification Requirements under Section 17 of the Philippine Competition Act and Rule 4, Section 3 of the Rules and Regulations to Implement Republic Act No. 10667

Commission Decision No. 021-M-02/2018 In the Matter of Udenna Corporation, Chelsea Logistics Holdings Corporation, and Trans-Asia Shipping Lines Inc.’s Alleged Violation of the Compulsory Notification Requirements under Section 17 of the Philippine Competition Act and Rule 4, Section 3 of the Rules and Regulations to Implement Republic Act No. 10667

Commission Decision No. 021-M-02/2018: 
In the Matter of Udenna Corporation, Chelsea Logistics Holdings Corporation,
and Trans-Asia Shipping Lines Inc.’s Alleged Violation of the Compulsory Notification Requirements
under Section 17 of the Philippine Competition Act and Rule 4, Section 3
of the Rules and Regulations to Implement Republic Act No. 10667

 

(PCC Case No. M-2018-03)
(MAO Case No. 3/2017)

1678154958_commission decision no.021-m-02-2018.pdf

Back